By: Kimberly Roselle
Enunciate, Articulate, and SPIT IT OUT! This is what the director used to say to me, when I was in the theatre. This was the best advice I have been given. When it comes to marketing it is not just about what you are saying but how you say it.
Imagine walking on to a lot and the sales person comes over to you and is slurring their words. Will you trust them? Will you keep listening to them? Most likely the answer is no. You can expound till you are blue in the face on the many virtues of a vehicle, but if your tone is monotone and you lack inflection the customer will tune you out and move on. Perhaps a salesperson approaches a customer, and every other word is “like” or “you know”, the first thoughts generally will be “no I don’t know that is why I am here” or “I’m not sure if I like it that’s why I am here”. This means that the customer has ceased listening to the details.
How do we Enunciate, Articulate, and SPIT IT OUT? Practice, Practice, Practice! Not too mention knowing your vehicles. Take a few minutes and out loud go over all of the details you would point out to a customer. Then do it again. What words are you stressing? What features should you place emphasis on? Are there any words you have trouble pronouncing? This is not a speech to memorize but knowledge that you can use to educate your customers.
A customer will not want to purchase from someone who doesn’t sound like they know what they are talking about, so take the time to practice what you are saying. Make sure you sound not only knowledgeable but are informative enough to be able to engage with your customers. If you sound like an authority they’ll believe you are an authority, helping you make the sale.
Anyone who is a real techno-geek about this stuff knows that there are two primary types of ads you can run through Google: text ads on the search network, and display ads on the display network.
Traditional text-based ads can only be run alongside unpaid organic search result listings on Google.com or other websites they partner with. The only images you will ever see on these pages are for related images or videos. But, in general, these are not display ads.
Display ads (often referred to as banner or image ads) show up on other websites across the Internet that provide content users are interested in. These “destination sites” partner with ad networks, like Google, to auction off space for advertisers to display their ads.
While there is far more to know about the intricacies and nuances of both search network ads and display network ads than this overview, they remain significantly different.
Until…
I stumbled upon this:
“What is that image and blurb to the right side of my search engine results,” I thought to myself? There seemed to be no mention of it anywhere online; until, digging through the depths of pages inside Google’s brain I came across this- the answer, which we will all soon become familiar with.
It’s called Knowledge Graph, a feature being rolled out to Google.com users over the next few days. I suggest checking out the video that can be found using the link above, since really only Google could explain a concept like this. If I had to take a stab at it, though, I would say it’s an intricate web of related things and places (similar to six degrees of separation) designed to make it easier for us to find things we are seeking but can’t seem to find the search terms that trigger our desired results.
Be on the look out for Knowledge Graph on your Google.com page in the next few days, and see for yourself the possibilities for your ad campaigns that this new Google feature can bring.
By: Justine Cervenka
Think just because they didn’t click on your ad that they’re not converting? Think again! Finally after many years of trying to track brand focused advertising and its correlation to conversions there was a study done by Pretarget and ComScore that may have an impact on how we measure success of a branding campaign. The study revealed that clicking on an ad had the lowest correlation to a conversion than those who viewed, hovered or engaged with the ad. Clicking an ad had a 0.01 correlation rate, followed by viewable impressions at 0.17 correlation rate and hover/interaction scored the highest rate at 0.49 out of 1.0 being the strongest correlation.
This new metric validates that developing ads that engage, entice educate and entertain web users is generating conversions. Brand advertising may no longer be a passive long-term driver, but it may indeed be having a larger influence then what we’ve been able to give it credit for in the past. This opens up many new opportunities as the lines between direct response online campaigns and brand impression based campaigns begin blur.
Source: AdvertisingAge, Crain Communications
By: Justine Cervenka
Think just because they didn’t click on your ad that they’re not converting? Think again! Finally after many years of trying to track brand focused advertising and its correlation to conversions there was a study done by Pretarget and ComScore that may have an impact on how we measure success of a branding campaign. The study revealed that clicking on an ad had the lowest correlation to a conversion than those who viewed, hovered or engaged with the ad. Clicking an ad had a 0.01 correlation rate, followed by viewable impressions at 0.17 correlation rate and hover/interaction scored the highest rate at 0.49 out of 1.0 being the strongest correlation.
This new metric validates that developing ads that engage, entice educate and entertain web users is generating conversions. Brand advertising may no longer be a passive long-term driver, but it may indeed be having a larger influence then what we’ve been able to give it credit for in the past. This opens up many new opportunities as the lines between direct response online campaigns and brand impression based campaigns begin blur.
Source: AdvertisingAge, Crain Communications
Facebook is the second most used website in the entire world, after Google (http://www.alexa.com/topsites), and one in five clicks in the U.S. are made on Facebook. So why did GM decide to pull its advertising campaign just days before the much talked about IPO of this revolutionary company?
GM claims that the campaign didn’t result in an adequate return on investment, but many in the marketing world aren’t buying it. According to Brian Wallace, VP-strategic internet marketing for Samsung Mobile, “Blaming Facebook for a lack of ROI on your advertising is akin to blaming the internet because no one purchased from your website.” He adds, “Facebook is a platform that attracts close to a billion people and it’s ultimately up to advertisers to understand how to optimize this platform for your customers.” (http://adage.com/article/digital/brands-facebook-advertising-optional/234816/)
While Facebook provides the perfect base for advertisers, it’s up to you to properly engage your potential customers and increase your brand awareness.
So what mistakes did GM make?
- By visiting facebook.com/generalmotors, you’ll get a taste of their posting style, which some can say fails to engage readers and encourage “likes” and revisits.
- Most Facebook users don’t visit GM’s page to see a picture of GM’s chairmen, but GM posted a photo of him on their page anyway. Although 379,000 people have “liked” the page, less than 200 “liked” that photo.
- GM also does a poor job motivating their fans to interact with them on their page. There are currently no contests or interactive posts, and GM doesn’t even phrase any of its status updates as questions. Rather than saying “we’re excited to announce the launch of…” why not ask your viewers if they’re excited, or what vehicles they’d like to see introduced next? Overall, the page appears static, and may be more to blame for GM’s success in the Facebook world than any ad campaign.
So how does this affect you? For starters, don’t think that advertising on Facebook or creating a Facebook page for your brand will automatically produce results. With so many people spending so much time on Facebook, you’ll have to work to consistently post value-added content.
What do you think? Did GM make the right move? What’s the best way to advertise on Facebook?
Facebook is the second most used website in the entire world, after Google (http://www.alexa.com/topsites), and one in five clicks in the U.S. are made on Facebook. So why did GM decide to pull its advertising campaign just days before the much talked about IPO of this revolutionary company?
GM claims that the campaign didn’t result in an adequate return on investment, but many in the marketing world aren’t buying it. According to Brian Wallace, VP-strategic internet marketing for Samsung Mobile, “Blaming Facebook for a lack of ROI on your advertising is akin to blaming the internet because no one purchased from your website.” He adds, “Facebook is a platform that attracts close to a billion people and it’s ultimately up to advertisers to understand how to optimize this platform for your customers.” (http://adage.com/article/digital/brands-facebook-advertising-optional/234816/)
While Facebook provides the perfect base for advertisers, it’s up to you to properly engage your potential customers and increase your brand awareness.
So what mistakes did GM make?
- By visiting facebook.com/generalmotors, you’ll get a taste of their posting style, which some can say fails to engage readers and encourage “likes” and revisits.
- Most Facebook users don’t visit GM’s page to see a picture of GM’s chairmen, but GM posted a photo of him on their page anyway. Although 379,000 people have “liked” the page, less than 200 “liked” that photo.
- GM also does a poor job motivating their fans to interact with them on their page. There are currently no contests or interactive posts, and GM doesn’t even phrase any of its status updates as questions. Rather than saying “we’re excited to announce the launch of…” why not ask your viewers if they’re excited, or what vehicles they’d like to see introduced next? Overall, the page appears static, and may be more to blame for GM’s success in the Facebook world than any ad campaign.
So how does this affect you? For starters, don’t think that advertising on Facebook or creating a Facebook page for your brand will automatically produce results. With so many people spending so much time on Facebook, you’ll have to work to consistently post value-added content.
What do you think? Did GM make the right move? What’s the best way to advertise on Facebook?
By: Jenn Mayer
As November looms closer and closer, talk of the presidential campaign is louder than ever. In this age, candidates don’t just campaign through televised debates and rallies. Rather, they take advantage of digital, email, and text message campaigns – just as you should. Their hits and misses in digitally interacting with their supporters can teach us a lot about how to manage our marketing campaigns.
President Obama was known as the “first social media president”. His use of social media, email, and mobile outreach allowed him to motivate supporters in a way that normally would have required an army of volunteers stationed around the country. His campaign relied so much on the Internet that Ariana Huffington, editor in chief of the Huffington Post, said “Were it not for the Internet, Barack Obama would not be president.”
In 2012, Obama’s Republican opponents have adopted his strategies in the form of intense e-mail marketing. This infographic (http://www.epolitics.com/2012/04/09/infographic-republican-presidential-campaign-emails-compared/) compares the last four Republican candidates standing and their email tendencies. Now that the primary is essentially over, with Mitt Romney as the likely candidate, we can analyze this infographic and see what might have helped Mitt win, and then apply that to your email marketing campaigns.
First, Mr. Romney’s e-mails were among the shortest of the field. The take away? Keep your emails reasonably short, while including relevant and attention-grabbing information. Your reader’s want to learn something from your message, but remember that they have lots of other e-mails to wade through.
Another important part of e-mail marketing is pushing your reader to your social media sites. Mitt Romney included links to his Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and personal website in his emails, while Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul did not include any. Allowing readers to continue onto your other sites makes it easier for them to form a bond with your brand and ultimately, decide to buy.
One mistake that Mitt Romney did make was sending out emails for his campaign from many different people. His campaign sent out messages from fifteen different people, while Santorum used only five. Most people decide whether or not to delete an email based on if they know the sender. Keep the message for your brand clear, and make sure the “From” line stays consistent.
Perhaps the most important part of email marketing is to encourage your readers to make a purchase from you. In the case of politicians, they want not only votes, but campaign donations. Rick Santorum’s emails explicitly requested a donation 92% of the time, while Mitt Romney’s did only 72% of the time. This might be a reflection of where they stood in the campaign – Santorum was the underdog, and needed funds to continue the fight. While you want to call your readers to action, some people are put off by too hard of a sell, especially when it’s in their personal inbox rather than TV or print ads. Similarly, voters need to learn about the candidate and trust him before they will be willing to donate to his cause. Lure your readers with why they should buy from you before you push them to do so.
In many ways, buying a car is similar to choosing whom to vote for. Both decisions are important, and will effect the next four to eight years of your life (or more!). Take a page out of the President’s book, and watch your sales increase.
It’s no secret that the Internet is the new way consumers are both researching and purchasing various items. However, the question remains, how do you ensure your product is the one being seen by consumers? The answer: clickable banner ads.
Banner ads, more commonly known as display ads, are ads that show up on various websites a business specifically targets. These can be targeted to Internet users based on location, search history or interests, as well as contextually placed (meaning the display ad is related to the content on the web page it appears next to). Say for example, you have recently read an article on a specific brand of car; a display ad relating to that vehicle may show up while reading that specific article, or my even appear at a later date.
It sounds simple enough right? But just because your banner ad shows up, does not mean users are actually clicking on it. So, how do you get those clicks? In my opinion you do this by creating display ads that are clickable. By this I mean create something that Internet users will want to click.
Currently there are various companies that are doing just that; they are creating display ads that draw people in. This can mean that they are relatable, for example it’s common knowledge that gas prices are on the rise, so why not focus on that, since consumers are actively turning towards more fuel-efficient vehicles. Or better yet, take a step out of the box and offer something different.
Nissan recently ran a campaign in Dubai aimed at ex-pats, who find it hard to purchase not only a car, but to become a homeowner in the country. The manufacturer teamed up with Dubizzle (a leading real estate website in Dubai) and combined both issues into one by creating the program “Nissan’s Househunter Test Drive”. This program allowed users who clicked on the ad to find the perfect Nissan for them based on their home, budget, neighborhood, and family size. After finding the car that is deemed right for you, the users are able to sign up for the Nissan to be brought to them for a test drive. By creating a banner ad that users in Dubai were able to find relatable, Nissan was able to promote their product, resulting in 1,200 test-drives.
Are your banner ads making the difference to consumers? Are they what we’d call clickable?
By: Yasmine Syed
In a nutshell: fuel economy. According to a new study conducted by Consumer Reports National Research Center, thirty-seven percent of study participants cited “fuel economy” as their leading consideration in car shopping. Quality was the second most important factor, trailed by safety and value. A sizable two-thirds of respondents said that they wanted their new car to have a significantly higher miles-per-gallon rating than their current vehicle. “Why”, you ask? It’s because of the economy, duh. In fact, ninety percent of the survey respondents blamed their new car buying behavior on the rising cost of gas.
The survey also found that considerably more car owners are open to downsizing their current vehicles, switching to a hybrid or even buying a car that runs on diesel. A majority of those individuals said they would strongly consider switching to a car that featured flex-fuel technology. Consumers under the age of fifty-five were significantly more willing to purchase a purely electric vehicle as opposed to a hybrid.
What should come as no surprise is that owners of large SUVs were the most open to downsizing their vehicle or, at the very least, switching to a smaller SUV or crossover. When asked to consider which vehicle they were least likely to purchase in the future, the top answers were: larger sedans and minivans. What was particularly surprising was the fact that a majority of survey respondents said that they would pay more for a vehicle as long as they could recover the additional cost by saving at the pump.
Though this news may not come as a shock, ask yourself: Have your marketing messages caught up to this obvious shift in consumer behavior? “No”, you say? Then call us. NOW!
By: Yasmine Syed
In a nutshell: fuel economy. According to a new study conducted by Consumer Reports National Research Center, thirty-seven percent of study participants cited “fuel economy” as their leading consideration in car shopping. Quality was the second most important factor, trailed by safety and value. A sizable two-thirds of respondents said that they wanted their new car to have a significantly higher miles-per-gallon rating than their current vehicle. “Why”, you ask? It’s because of the economy, duh. In fact, ninety percent of the survey respondents blamed their new car buying behavior on the rising cost of gas.
The survey also found that considerably more car owners are open to downsizing their current vehicles, switching to a hybrid or even buying a car that runs on diesel. A majority of those individuals said they would strongly consider switching to a car that featured flex-fuel technology. Consumers under the age of fifty-five were significantly more willing to purchase a purely electric vehicle as opposed to a hybrid.
What should come as no surprise is that owners of large SUVs were the most open to downsizing their vehicle or, at the very least, switching to a smaller SUV or crossover. When asked to consider which vehicle they were least likely to purchase in the future, the top answers were: larger sedans and minivans. What was particularly surprising was the fact that a majority of survey respondents said that they would pay more for a vehicle as long as they could recover the additional cost by saving at the pump.
Though this news may not come as a shock, ask yourself: Have your marketing messages caught up to this obvious shift in consumer behavior? “No”, you say? Then call us. NOW!
